1. Home
  2. Region
  3. Gujarat court acquitted 28, convicted 49 in 2008 Ahmedabad serial blast case

Gujarat court acquitted 28, convicted 49 in 2008 Ahmedabad serial blast case

By Ruchi Upadhyay 
Updated Date
Gujarat court acquitted 28, convicted 49 in 2008 Ahmedabad serial blast case

Gandhinagar: A special court in Gujarat acquitted 28 out of 77 accused in the 2008 Ahmedabad serial bomb blast case. 49 Accused were convicted. The quantum of the sentence will be pronounced by the court tomorrow. The trial against 77 accused was completed by the court in September last year. Nearly 56 people were killed in a series of bomb blasts in Gujarat’s Ahmedabad in 2008.

Also Read :- Court sentences 38 convicts to death, 11 to life imprisonment in 2008 Ahmedabad serial blasts

The police had claimed people associated with banned terror outfit Indian Mujahideen (IM), a faction of radicals of the outlawed Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), were involved in the blasts. It was alleged that Indian Mujahideen terrorists had planned and executed these blasts as a revenge for the 2002 post-Godhra riots in Gujarat, in which several persons from the minority community had died.

Days after the serial blasts in Ahmedabad, the police had recovered bombs from different parts of Surat. Following the recovery, 20 FIRs were registered in Ahmedabad and 15 in Surat.

The trial was conducted after the court merged all 35 FIRs into one. The trial commenced against 78 accused and the number came down to 77 after one of them turned an approver.

The trial was conducted against 77 accused, for which the prosecution examined over 1,100 witnesses. The lengthy legal proceeding began in December 2009, over a year after the terror strikes in the state’s commercial hub. The accused are facing charges of murder, criminal conspiracy, and have also been booked under relevant provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), an anti-terror law.

Also Read :- "Bomb Blast" on rail tracks in Jharkhand derails diesel locomotive

The special court initially heard the case from inside the Sabarmati Central Jail for security reasons and the proceedings were later conducted mostly through video-conferencing. When the trial was underway, some of the accused had allegedly tried to escape by digging a 213 feet long tunnel in the jail in 2013.

Further reading:
For the latest news and reviews, follow us on Facebook and Twitter ...