1. Home
  2. Business
  3. “I sleep with clear conscience”: Cyrus Mistry on Supreme Court’s verdict

“I sleep with clear conscience”: Cyrus Mistry on Supreme Court’s verdict

By Saima Siddiqui 
Updated Date
“I sleep with clear conscience”: Cyrus Mistry on Supreme Court’s verdict

New Delhi: Former chairman of Tata Group, Cyrus Mistry, on Tuesday finally broke his silence on the Supreme Court’s judgement stating though he is disappointed by the verdict but his conscience is clear.

Also Read :- Cabinet approves ₹ 6.29 lakh crore relief package for pandemic-hit sectors

Backing the decision to sack him as chairman of the over $100 billion salt-to-software group in 2016, said today “life is not always fair” but “I sleep with a clear conscience”.

“Every member of the society looks to institutions such as courts to validate and endorse the appropriateness of his or her actions and beliefs. As a minority shareholder of Tata Sons, I am personally disappointed by the outcome of our case. Although I will no longer be able to directly influence the direction of governance of the Tata group, I hope that the issues I have raised will cause deeper reflection and influence individuals concerned to catalyse change,” Mistry said in a statement.

“I sleep with a clear conscience,” he said, adding, this was another step in the evolution of his life. “We will celebrate the good times and take the knocks on our chins,” it added.

“In hindsight, while I may have had many imperfections, I have no doubt or erosion of conviction about the direction I chose, the integrity behind my actions and their consequences.”

Also Read :- Petrol price in Mumbai nears ₹105 after another hike. Check rates in major cities

Stating his performance was reviewed by nearly 50 independent directors across multiple Tata group company boards he served, Mistry said the performance metric spoke for itself. “I am humbled by the continued support I have received from my former colleagues and other board members. All the successes we achieved, was built on the efforts of a very talented team, including my executive management team (The GEC), the managers and staff of Tata Sons, as well as the management teams in the Tata operating companies supported by their respective board members,” he added.

“Over the last four years, I have had the opportunity to reflect on my actions and on whether I could have handled the generational change in leadership better. In hindsight, while I may have had many imperfections, I have no doubt or erosion of conviction about the direction I chose, the integrity behind my actions and their consequences.”

Last week, the apex court upheld company’s decision of removal of Mistry saying, “That failed business decisions and the removal of a person from Directorship can never be projected as acts oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of the minorities, is too well-settled. In fact it may be conceded today by Tata sons that one important decision that the Board took on 16.03.2012 certainly turned out to be a wrong decision of a life time,” the judges said.

Disappointed by the curt’s order, Mr Mistry had said, “As a minority shareholder of Tata Sons, I am personally disappointed by the outcome of the judgement with respect to our case. Although I will no longer be able to influence the direction of governance of the Tata group directly, I hope that the issues I have raised, will cause deeper reflection and influence individuals concerned to catalyse change. I sleep with a clear conscience,” Mr Mistry said in a statement.

“Life is not always fair, but we are still the lucky ones – I am lucky to have the unwavering support of my family, friends, colleagues – past & present. I am grateful to my legal team that has remained steadfast and committed beyond the call of duty, through this journey. This is another step in the evolution of life for me and my family. We will celebrate the good times and take the knocks on our chins.”

Also Read :- Six of top 10 firm's market cap soars over Rs 1.11 lakh cr; TCS, Infosys lead gainers

The statement was titled “Grateful for the opportunity – My conscience is clear.”

Mr Mistry said that his aim at Tata was to ensure a “robust board driven system of decision-making and governance that is larger than any one individual”.

He said he still believed that if directors on various boards could discharge their fiduciary duties “without fear or favour” one would protect value for all stakeholders in Tata Sons and its various Group companies.

After the verdict, Ratan Tata had called it validation after “relentless attacks” on his integrity. “It is not an issue of winning or losing. After relentless attacks on my integrity and the ethical conduct of the group, the judgment upholding Tata Sons is a validation or the values and ethics that have always been the guiding principles of the group. It reinforces the fairness and justice displayed by our judiciary,” Mr Tata had wrote.

Further reading:
For the latest news and reviews, follow us on Facebook and Twitter ...
X