1. Home
  2. Nation
  3. SC forms expert panel to probe, says Centre’s Vague Denial not sufficient: Pegasus row

SC forms expert panel to probe, says Centre’s Vague Denial not sufficient: Pegasus row

By Ruchi Upadhyay 
Updated Date
SC forms expert panel to probe, says Centre’s Vague Denial not sufficient: Pegasus row

New Delhi: Allegations of snooping using the Pegasus software are about fundamental rights and “could have a chilling effect”, the Supreme Court said today, setting up an inquiry panel headed by a retired judge
Retired Supreme Court Justice RV Ravindran will head the committee and an IPS officer will assist him, along with officials from the National Forensic University.

Also Read :- Centre ready to revisit Rs 8 lakh income limit for EWS in NEET-PG all India quota

The committee’s report has to be handed in to the court by the next hearing, two months later.

“We issued notice to the government. We gave ample opportunity to the government to give details of all action taken by it. But despite repeated chances they gave limited affidavit that does not give clarity. If they had clarified they would have reduced the burden on us. But that does not mean state gets a free pass every time national security is raised,” the Supreme Court said.

“The court will not encroach upon national security but that does not make the court a mute spectator. The nature of the allegations is about fundamental rights being violated. This could have chilling effect. There are also allegations of foreign agencies being involved.”

The court said a “vague denial from the government” is not sufficient.

Also Read :- SC orders 'expeditious' deployment of addition forces to Tripura amid civic polls

“Hence allegations need to be probed,” said the court, saying that an expert committee supervised by a retired Supreme Court judge would inquire into the snooping allegations.

Multiple petitions have called for an investigation into allegations that Israeli Pegasus spyware sold only to governments – was used to target opposition leaders, journalists and others.

Petitioners, including former union minister Yashwant Sinha, CPM MP John Brittas, Supreme Court advocate ML Sharma, the Editors’ Guild of India and individual journalists, had asked the court to order the government to produce details of the alleged unauthorised surveillance using Pegasus.

The Supreme Court said the petitions raised a concern about how technology could be used and abused.

“Without allowing ourselves to be consumed into political rhetoric, we have never refrained from protecting people from their fundamental rights being abused,” said the judges.

Also Read :- Amid Tripura civic polls, SC asks centre to deploy additional forces to secure booths

The right to privacy, they said, needs to be discussed. Agencies used surveillance to fight terror and there could be a need to intrude upon privacy, but the court had a rider.

“Privacy is not just for journalists and politicians but also about the rights of individuals. There are certain limitations on the right to privacy but all decisions should be under the constitutional process.”

The petitions also raised important concerns for the freedom of press, which is important pillar of democracy, and the protection of sources of journalists, the court said.

The judges said it was an “uphill task” to form the committee.

Further reading:
For the latest news and reviews, follow us on Facebook and Twitter ...