1. Home
  2. Nation
  3. Wearing hijab not essential practice of Islam: Karnataka govt tells High Court

Wearing hijab not essential practice of Islam: Karnataka govt tells High Court

By Saima Siddiqui 
Updated Date

Bengaluru: Defending the banning of burqa inside the educational institutes, the Karnataka government contended before the high court on Friday, that wearing the hijab is not an essential religious practice of Islam and preventing it does not violate the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.

Also Read :- Hubballi Idgah row: High Court grants permission for Ganesh celebrations at Maidan

“We have taken a stand that wearing the hijab is not an essential religious part of Islam,” Advocate General of Karnataka Prabhuling Navadgi told the court of Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice JM Khazi and Justice Krishna M Dixit.

The top state government lawyer said that there was nothing unlawful about a February 5 order which banned clothes “which disturb equality, integrity and public order” amid raging protests and counter-protests over a ban on hijabs in many schools and colleges in the state.

“There is no issue of hijab in the government order. The government order is innocuous in nature. It does not affect the petitioners’ rights,” he said, adding that colleges can decide if they want to allow the hijab in the classroom.

“Conscious stand of the state is that we do not want to intervene in religious matter. We could have said the hijab was against secularism and order and could have said it is not permissible. We have not. It is a stated stand of the state we did not want to intervene,” he said.

Also Read :- Twitter challenges Indian govt's orders to remove content, accuses officials of abusing power

However, he admitted that the portion prescribing clothes “in consonance with unity and equality” could have been worded better.

“Here the draftsman went a bit enthusiastic. What was meant was, in case no uniform is prescribed, please wear decent clothes. I agree it could have been worded better,” he said.

Furthermore, the Advocate General rejected the charge of some Muslim students, who had challenged the Karnataka government’s order on February 5, saying that it violated Article 25 of the Constitution.

Article 25 gives freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion to the citizens of India.

The government order also does not violate Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution which guarantees to all its citizens the right to freedom of speech and expression, Mr Navadgi argued.

Also Read :- Not allowed to take exams in Hijab, 2 Karnataka students of class 12 board leave

The Karnataka High Court has been hearing petitions over  hijab controversy since last week after tension escalated across the state banning of the hijab in classrooms that started spreading in the state since late December.

The High Court, in its interim order pending consideration of all petitions related to the hijab row, last week restrained all the students from wearing saffron shawls, scarves, hijab and any religious flag within the classroom.

Further reading:
For the latest news and reviews, follow us on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter पर फॉलो करे...